The federal government signed an agreement with the Assembly of First Nations Tuesday to outline how it will fund an overhaul of the First Nations child welfare system — a detail that was left out of recent legislation.
The Trudeau government last year passed Bill C-92 — officially known as An Act Respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis Children, Youth and Families — to reduce the number of youth in care, and allow communities to create their own child welfare systems to bring and keep their youth home.
The groundbreaking legislation came into effect this year but did not include any funding tied to the law.
Today’s agreement, signed by Indigenous Services Minister Marc Miller and AFN National Chief Perry Bellegarde, establishes a “joint fiscal table” on First Nations child and family services — a forum where Ottawa and First Nations can negotiate funding agreements to support communities who want to assume the responsibility of caring for children.
The agreement signed today has no dollar figure attached. Miller said “complex” discussions are underway now to settle on just how much money is needed.
Miller said some communities are ready to take up this work now but the pandemic has slowed progress.
Bellegarde said the agreement is about devolving power from the provincial care systems — where Indigenous children are vastly over-represented — to individual First Nations, so that more children can remain in their home communities.
“This is really about making a difference for children in care. First Nations law should be paramount,” Bellegarde said.
Some provinces have been more willing than others to hand over this authority to First Nations, Bellegarde said. Quebec has launched a constitutional challenge to the law, saying these social services are the exclusive responsibility of the provinces. Bellegarde said Quebec Premier François Legault shouldn’t waste taxpayer dollars on a legal fight and instead commit money to supporting First Nations care for their children.
Beyond a promise to create this fiscal table, Ottawa and the AFN committed Tuesday to holding regular bilateral meetings to ensure C-92 is fully implemented.
During these meetings, the two parties will develop a “national distinctions-based policy” to ensure standards of care are uniform. They will also co-develop “tools and mechanisms” to help First Nations implement this program.
Funding was not tied to federal legislation passed last year to recognize Indigenous control over child welfare. (Chris Wattie/Reuters)
Longtime Indigenous child advocate Cindy Blackstock, the executive director of the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, has seen the draft protocol, which is not legally binding.
“It’s really unclear to me what this actually is going to mean on the ground, and how it’s going to be different from the countless other memorandums of understanding and other documents the federal government has signed over the years,” Blackstock said.
Cindy Blackstock, executive director of the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada, is concerned the agreement won’t lead to changes for youth. (Simon Gohier/CBC)
Blackstock said it’s difficult for communities to establish and operate their own systems under the law without any attached funding.
“This becomes kind of like a paper tiger,” Blackstock said. “That’s why the funding element is so critical to really making this bill a real game-changer for kids.”
Bill C-92 also created national standards on how Indigenous children are to be treated. For example, when looking to place kids in foster care, authorities are to prioritize extended family and home communities.
Indigenous children make up seven per cent of Canada’s population, but they represent more than half of youth in care, according to the 2016 census.
There are more Indigenous children in care now than at the height of the residential school era.
Assembly of First Nations National Chief Perry Bellegarde called for the protocol in the fall. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)
Blackstock said Ottawa always had money to address the inequalities within the Indigenous child welfare system, as shown from the billions of dollars being spent on COVID-19 relief.
“They simply chose not to do it,” Blackstock said.
“They may be wanting to use this as political cover, but hopefully I’m wrong. Hopefully, it actually is something that’s going to be meaningful change.”